Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max 0902 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- Qwen3.8 Max 0902AlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max 0902 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 26/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 57/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
3.5M
Completed sessions
No usage
92,486,292
Token share
No usage
34.2%
Tokens
No usage
394T+100%
No trend data
AUG 31OCT 25
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
68.9%318K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max 0902·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max 0902 vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max 0902·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba Mini