Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs Grok 4.7

Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Qwen3.8 Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	72/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	24/100	74/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Qwen

xAI

Context length

500K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text, Image, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Qwen

xAI

Pricing

Input

$0.16/ 1M

$2.00/ 1M

Output

$0.47/ 1M

$6.00/ 1M

Cached input

$0.02/ 1M

$0.50/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

215K

73K

Completed sessions

2,568,786

184,155

Token share

0.19%

0.01%

Tokens

2.5T+123%

90B+100%

SEP 12NOV 6

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

61.2%9.7K user-weeks

44.4%1.9K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 FlashJamba Mini Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini