Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash vs LongCat-2.5-Preview
- Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- LongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituanHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 74/100 | 80/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| LongCat-2.5-Preview | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 60/100 | 80/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.47/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
168K
95K
Completed sessions
1,286,903
4,363,241
Token share
0.23%
0.45%
Tokens
2.2T+100%
4.4T+100%
AUG 13OCT 7
AUG 13OCT 7
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
59%7.2K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba MiniLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash vs Jamba LargeQwen3.8 Flash·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonLongCat-2.5-Preview vs Jamba LargeLongCat-2.5-Preview·Jamba Large