CompareAI models
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | 100/100 | No data | 31/100 | 64/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| Step 3.5 Flash 2603 | 100/100 | 92/100 | 83/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | 90/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
256K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITQwen3.8 2.4T A95B·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonQwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B·Qwen3.8 27BRelated comparisonStep 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Qwen3.8 27BStep 3.5 Flash 2603·Qwen3.8 27B