GitHub[220K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Hy4

  1. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder50/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Hy450/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder54/10092/10033/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.40/ 1M
$0.42/ 1M
Output
$1.60/ 1M
$1.25/ 1M
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
111K
4.6K
Completed sessions
1,218,704
19,399
Token share
0.05%
0%
Tokens
643B-59%
60B+100%
SEP 12NOV 6
SEP 12NOV 6
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
61.7%6.1K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.