Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M2.7
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 82/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 76/100 | 55/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.50/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
39K
43K
Completed sessions
86,921
155,570
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
31B-90%
152B-56%
AUG 30OCT 24
AUG 30OCT 24
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
49.3%1.3K user-weeks
64.9%2K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7·Jamba Mini