GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Qwen3.8 Flash

  1. Qwen3.7 PlusAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
  2. Qwen3.8 FlashAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Qwen3.7 Plus50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder53/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Qwen3.8 Flash50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder72/10081/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.40/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$1.60/ 1M
$0.47/ 1M
Cached input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
170K
180K
Completed sessions
990,026
1,415,864
Token share
0.1%
0.25%
Tokens
933B-52%
2.4T+100%
AUG 17OCT 11
AUG 17OCT 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.4%10K user-weeks
59%7.2K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.