Compare AI models: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Claude Opus 5.5AnthropicHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 100/100 | 75/100 | 9/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 90/100 | 0/100 | 18/100 | 82/100 | 50/100 | 100/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$4.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$20/ 1M
$10/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.10/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
No usage
No usage
Completed sessions
No usage
No usage
Token share
No usage
No usage
Tokens
No usage
No usage
No trend data
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeClaude Opus 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Opus 5.5·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Jamba MiniClaude Sonnet 5.5·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonClaude Opus 5.5 vs Jamba LargeClaude Opus 5.5·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonClaude Sonnet 5.5 vs Jamba LargeClaude Sonnet 5.5·Jamba Large