Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed
- Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K2.6 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 80/100 | 37/100 | 62/100 | 50/100 | 27/100 |
| Kimi K2.7 Code Highspeed | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 25/100 | 62/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.74/ 1M
$1.90/ 1M
Output
$3.72/ 1M
$8.00/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.38/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
117K
0
Completed sessions
229,145
6
Token share
0.02%
0%
Tokens
193B-79%
00%
AUG 17OCT 11
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
56.7%5.7K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba LargeKimi K2.6·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed vs Jamba LargeKimi K2.7 Code Highspeed·Jamba Large