Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.7 vs MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M2.7-highspeedMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 78/100 | 58/100 | 48/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.7-highspeed | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 45/100 | 48/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
205K
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.40/ 1M
Cached input
$0.06/ 1M
$0.06/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
57K
0
Completed sessions
174,314
0
Token share
0.02%
0%
Tokens
210B-47%
00%
AUG 18OCT 12
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
66.1%2.2K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M2.7·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed vs Jamba LargeMiniMax-M2.7-highspeed·Jamba Large