GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Kimi K2.5

  1. DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
  2. Kimi K2.5MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Flash25/10075/10058/10081/1000/1000/100
Kimi K2.550/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark20/10044/10062/10050/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.45/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.80/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.1M
20K
Completed sessions
37,128,352
14,654
Token share
15%
0%
Tokens
145T-38%
9B-82%
AUG 18OCT 12
AUG 18OCT 12
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.3%272K user-weeks
77.1%214 user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.