Compare AI models: DeepSeek Chat vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash
- DeepSeek ChatDeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek Chat | 0/100 — Reasoning not supported | 73/100 | 69/100 | 81/100 | 17/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
False
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.15/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$0.60/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.003/ 1M
$0.006/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
0
1.8M
Completed sessions
27
32,494,117
Token share
0%
19.9%
Tokens
00%
190T+100%
No trend data
AUG 17OCT 11
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
57.9%188K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek Chat vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek Chat·Jamba MiniNearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonDeepSeek Chat vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek Chat·Jamba LargeRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba LargeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba Large